What
Makes Inquiry so Hard? (And Why is it Worth It?)
Paper presented
by N. Trautmann, J. MaKinster, and L. Avery at the 77th
Annual Conference of the National Association for Research
in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, April 1-4, 2004
Despite growing
consensus regarding the value of inquiry-based teaching
and learning, the implementation of such practices continues
to be a challenge for many teachers. The Cornell Science
Inquiry Partnerships (CSIP) program aims to provide sustained
and long-term support for teachers who wish to implement
inquiry-oriented teaching. Through CSIP, university graduate
student fellows work with middle and high school teachers
to develop and implement inquiry-based lessons and units.
This study investigated challenges and rewards inherent
in this process. Analysis of teacher interviews, focus group
sessions, classroom observations, and ongoing discussions
with teachers and fellows suggests that the participants
face multiple barriers to engaging their students in open-ended
inquiry. The most commonly perceived barriers include district
or state mandated curricula, insufficient time for inquiry,
student expectations and abilities, concern about the potential
for not accomplishing specified learning goals, and fear
of the unknown. Through partnerships with university fellows,
teachers are able to address these concerns and become increasingly
comfortable with inquiry-based teaching and learning. Benefits
reported by teachers and students include increased motivation
and interest in science, a greater degree of higher order
thinking leading to deeper understandings, and development
of abilities to work independently in designing and conducting
valid scientific experiments and interpreting the results.
|